Place of publication:
Prodr. 8:444. 1844
Comment:
- since this name was originally based on Echites paniculata Roxb., this was an illegitimate later homonym (non Poir. 1812; Shenzhen ICN 53), so there is no parenthetical authorship (Shenzhen ICN 58)
- Echites paniculatus Roxb. was proposed for conservation against the earlier homonym (Shenzhen ICN 53) E. paniculatus Poir., but this proposal was converted to a proposal to conserve Anodendron paniculatum, which would otherwise be a superfluous, illegitimate name for E. manubriatus Wall. ex Steud., against E. manubriatus and E. parviflorus Roxb., but this amended proposal has failed
Verified:
02/27/2019
ARS Systematic Botanists.