International Livestock Research Institute
0
Cart
Welcome!
GRIN-Global
ILRI Forage Genebank
Version: 2.1.0.0
Accessions
Descriptors
Reports
GRIN Taxonomy
Simple Query of Species Data
Advanced Query of Species Data
Query Families and Genera
Crop Wild Relative Data
Nodulation Data
World Economic Plants
About GRIN Taxonomy
GRIN
USDA Genetic Resource Collections
About GRIN-Global
Use of Cookies
NPGS Distribution Policy
Help
Contact Us
Your Profile
Your Profile
Your Order History
Your Address Book
Your Wish List
Taxon:
Prunus persica
(L.) Batsch
Nomenclature
Common Names
Distribution
Economic Uses
Summary
Genus:
Prunus
Subgenus:
Amygdalus
Family:
Rosaceae
Subfamily:
Amygdaloideae
Tribe:
Amygdaleae
Nomen number:
30065
Place of publication:
Beytr. Entw. Gewachsreich 30. 1801
Verified:
05/09/2011
ARS Systematic Botanists.
Accessions:
0
(
0
active,
0
available)
in National Plant Germplasm System.
Other conspecific taxa
Prunus persica
(L.) Batsch f.
compressa
(Loudon) Rehder
(0 active accession[s])
Prunus persica
(L.) Batsch f.
persica
(0 active accession[s])
Prunus persica
(L.) Batsch var.
nucipersica
(Suckow) C. K. Schneid.
(0 active accession[s])
Prunus persica
(L.) Batsch var.
persica
(0 active accession[s])
Autonyms (not in current use), synonyms and invalid designations
Heterotypic Synonym(s)
Amygdalus persica
L. var.
camelliiflora
(hort. ex L. H. Bailey) Ricker
Amygdalus persica
L. var.
densa
(Makino) Ricker
Prunus persica
(L.) Batsch var.
camelliiflora
hort. ex L. H. Bailey
Prunus persica
(L.) Batsch var.
densa
Makino
No images
Reference(s)
Aldén, B., S. Ryman, & M. Hjertson.
2012. Svensk Kulturväxtdatabas, SKUD (Swedish Cultivated and Utility Plants Database; online resource)
www.skud.info
Bortiri, E. et al.
2001. Phylogeny and systematics of
Prunus
(Rosaceae) as determined by sequence analysis of ITS and the chloroplast trnL-trnF spacer DNA. Syst. Bot. 26:797-807.
Note:
this study included
Prunus persica
; it found a non-monophyletic subgenus
Amygdalus
, but this species and
P. dulcis
were recovered in a monophyletic peaches and almond group
Botanical Society of the British Isles.
BSBI taxon database (on-line resource).
URL:
http://rbg-web2.rbge.org.uk/BSBI/taxonsearch.php
Cao, K. et al.
2014. Comparative population genomics reveals the domestication history of the peach,
Prunus persica
, and human influences on perennial fruit crops. Genome Biol. 15:415.
DOI:
10.1186/s13059-014-0415-1
.
URL:
http://genomebiology.com/
Chin, S.-W. et al.
2014. Diversification of almonds, peaches, plums and cherries - Molecular systematics and biogeographic history of
Prunus
(Rosaceae). Molec. Phylogenet. Evol. 76:34-38.
URL:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/10557903
Cooper, M. R. & A. W. Johnson.
1998. Poisonous plants and fungi in Britain: animal and human poisoning
Note:
poisonous
Davis, P. H., ed.
1965-1988. Flora of Turkey and the east Aegean islands.
Note:
=
Persica vulgaris
Mill.
Encke, F. et al.
1984. Zander: Handwörterbuch der Pflanzennamen, 13. Auflage
Esmenjaud, D. & E. Dirlewanger.
2007. Plum. Genome mapping and molecular breeding in plants (7 vols.) Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 4:119-135.
Note:
this review cited
Prunus persica
as a source of pest resistance though graft stock for plum
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).
2010. Ecocrop (on-line resource).
URL:
http://ecocrop.fao.org/ecocrop/srv/en/cropListDetails?code=&relation=beginsWith&name=Prunus+persica&quantity=1
Fu, Y. C. et al.
1977-. Flora intramongolica.
Groth, D.
2005. pers. comm.
Note:
re. Brazilian common names
Hackett, C. & J. Carolane.
1982. Edible Horticultural Crops Academic Press.
Hara, H. et al.
1978-1982. An enumeration of the flowering plants of Nepal.
Kingsbury, J. M.
1964. Poisonous plants of the United States and Canada.
Note:
poisonous
Liberty Hyde Bailey Hortorium.
1976. Hortus third.
Martínez-Gómez, P. et al.
2003. Relationships among peach, almond, and related species as detected by simple sequence repeat markers. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 128:667-671.
Note:
this study included
Prunus persica
as a species used in almond breeding
McGuffin, M., J. T. Kartesz, A. Y. Leung, & A. O. Tucker.
2000. Herbs of commerce, ed. 2 American Herbal Products Association, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Meikle, R. D.
1977-1985. Flora of Cyprus.
Mowrey, B. D. & D. J. Werner.
1990. Phylogenetic relationships among species of
Prunus
as inferred by isozyme markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 80:129-133.
URL:
http://link.springer.com/journal/volumesAndIssues/122
Note:
this study examined
Prunus persica
that grouped with other examined members of subgenus
Amygdalus
Mun-Chan, B. et al.
1986. A checklist of the Korean cultivated plants. Kulturpflanze 34:120.
Natural Products Research Institute, Seoul National University.
1998. Medicinal plants in the Republic of Korea. WHO Regional Publications Western Pacific Series No. 21.
URL:
http://www.wpro.who.int/internet/files/pub/97/235.pdf
Ohwi, J.
1965. Flora of Japan (Engl. ed.).
Okie, W. R. & M. Rieger.
2003. Inheritance of venation pattern in
Prunus ferganensis
×
persica
hybrids. Acta Hort. 622:261-264.
Ortega-Sada, J. L.
1987. Flora de interes apicola y polinizacion de cultivos.
Personal Care Products Council.
INCI
URL:
http://www.personalcarecouncil.org/public/what-inci
Porcher, M. H. et al.
Searchable World Wide Web Multilingual Multiscript Plant Name Database (MMPND) (on-line resource).
URL:
http://www.plantnames.unimelb.edu.au/Sorting/Frontpage.html
Rechinger, K. H., ed.
1963-. Flora iranica.
Note:
=
Persica vulgaris
Mill.
Rohrer, J. R.
2011.
Prunus
(Rosaceae). Flora of North America. 9: in press.
URL:
http://floranorthamerica.org/
Rubio-Cabetas, M. J. et al.
1996. Fertilisation assessment and postzygotic development in several intra- and interspecific
Prunus
hybrids. Euphytica 90:325-330.
Note:
this study examined hybrids between
Prunus dulcis
(as
amygdalus
) ×
P. persica
Steyermark, J. A.
1977. Flora of Missouri.
Tutin, T. G. et al., eds.
1964-1980. Flora europaea.
Verheij, E. W. M. & R. E. Coronel, eds.
1991. Edible fruits and nuts. Plant Resources of South-East Asia (PROSEA) 2:62.
URL:
http://proseanet.org
Wu Zheng-yi & P. H. Raven et al., eds.
1994-. Flora of China (English edition).
URL:
http://www.efloras.org/browse.aspx?flora_id=2
Note:
=
Amygdalus persica
L.
Zeinalabedini, M. et al.
2010. The origin and dissemination of the cultivated almond as determined by nuclear and chloroplast SSR marker analysis. Sci. Hort. 125:593-601.
Note:
mentions
2018. Mid-Atlantic invasive plant species (on-line resource)
Common names
English
peach –
Reference(s)
Japanese Rōmaji
momo –
Reference(s)
Portuguese (Brazil)
pêssego –
Reference(s)
Swedish
persika –
Reference(s)
Transcribed Chinese
tao –
Reference(s)
Transcribed Korean
bogsunganamu –
Reference(s)
Distribution
Exportable format
order_code
Status
Continent
Subcontinent
Country
State
Note
2
Cultivated
only cult.
6
Other
probable origin n. China
Cultivated
(only cult.)
Other
(probable origin n. China)
Economic Uses
Usage
Type
Note
Reference
Bee plants
honey production
Ortega-Sada, J. L.
1987. Flora de interes apicola y polinizacion de cultivos.
Medicines
folklore
McGuffin, M., J. T. Kartesz, A. Y. Leung, & A. O. Tucker.
2000. Herbs of commerce, ed. 2 American Herbal Products Association, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Vertebrate poisons
mammals
Kingsbury, J. M.
1964. Poisonous plants of the United States and Canada.
Note:
poisonous
Vertebrate poisons
mammals
Cooper, M. R. & A. W. Johnson.
1998. Poisonous plants and fungi in Britain: animal and human poisoning
Note:
poisonous
Name
References